|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
UPDATES
|
Blood on Putin's hands It
is now absolutely clear that the deaths resulting from the actions of
the Russian special forces in ending the Moscow theatre siege far outnumber
those killed by the Chechen suicide fighters. A
statement by Andrei Seltsovsky, chairman of the health committee of
the city of Moscow, that only two of the dead hostages were killed by
gunshot wounds places the blame for the casualties squarely on the Russian
government and its armed forces. Seltsovsky
said that the other 116 hostages confirmed dead by Monday had died of
gas poisoning. Another 150 are languishing in hospital, many of them
still critically ill. The authorities are still refusing to tell doctors
the nature of the gas used to stun the hostage takers while troops entered
the building. Chemical
warfare experts believe it may be nerve gas or BZ which has hallucinogenic
properties, possibly a type banned under international treaty. Other
facts are emerging about the siege, which prove that Putin and the military
at no time considered the option of entering into serious negotiations
about a non-violent way of ending the siege. The
bottom line is that it is the prolonged and brutal occupation of Chechnya
by Russian forces which led inexorably to the showdown and deaths in
Moscow.
Russian
forces have killed tens of thousands of Chechens and Russians in the
capital city, Grozny and other areas over the past decade. Grozny, once
a modern city of hundreds of thousands, was virtually razed to the ground
by mass bombardment. A
report by the Society for Russian-Chechen Relations in collaboration
with Human Rights Watch documented that in one month alone – between
July and August this year – 59 civilians were shot dead, 64 abducted,
168 seriously wounded and 298 tortured. The
horrific activities of the Omon and Spetsnaz special forces, which commonly
include rape and torture, and the blowing up of victims, have continued
since the first Chechen war which began in December 1994. After
a decade of terror against not only the separatist fighters, but the
civilian population, a new generation of Chechen commanders has grown
up who have moved away from the more secular moderation of older leaders
like Aslan Maskhadov. The
nationalist resistance of the mid 1990s did not lead to a separate state
or the departure of Russian troops. Extreme desperation combined with
the lack of a revolutionary secular alternative has left the field open
for a mystical form of Islamic Jihad and individual terrorism aimed
at innocent Russians seen in the Moscow siege. The
suicide bombers in Moscow were young men and women who felt that death
was a better way out than life under the present conditions. As
relatives and friends gathered outside the Moscow theatre on Friday,
about 100 demonstrated for an end to the occupation of Chechnya,
supporting the hostage-takers’ original demand. The protest was
quickly banned with some demonstrators being detained by police. Some
who had previously supported Putin’s war against the Chechens, said
they now believed Russian troops should leave Chechnya and “let them
live as they want to live”, in the words of one 28-year-old worker. Early
on in the siege, one agonised relation shouted at the television camera
that “First Putin killed our sons by sending them to Chechnya. Now he
is killing other Russians by not taking our troops out.” The
argument used by Putin, supported by Blair and the British media, is
that violently breaking the siege was the least of all evils, and may
have saved hundreds of lives by preventing the Chechens from blowing
up the entire theatre. But
the entire event would not have taken place if Russian forces had withdrawn
from Chechnya in the first place and Chechens granted the right to self-determination. Putin’s
dirty war in Chechnya is financially assisted by global capitalist leaders.
He can keep his weapons of mass destruction, use chemical weapons against
his own people and oppress minorities with the blessing of the White
House and Downing Street. Their hypocrisy and double standards knows
no bounds. Blair
and Bush have an agreement with Putin that allows him to do what he
likes in Chechnya as long as Russia doesn’t interfere with their "war
on terrorism" and the plan to bomb and occupy Iraq. That’s
why Blair was on the telephone twice during and after the siege to express
his support. He congratulated the Russian president in the House of
Commons even as the casualty figures due to the gassing of hostages
were rising. Putin, the butcher of Chechnya, can continue to count Blair
as a close ally. |
|||||
|
||||||
|
||||||