|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
UPDATES
|
Mirroring
the gentry The
wheels of art historical justice may grind slowly, but often come up
with unexpected corrections of what has been the “canon”, or the accepted
view. But
Alex Kidson of Liverpool’s Walker Art Gallery has performed like Sherlock
Holmes, searching in obscure photo archives and locating lost works
by Romney in remote attics. Kidson
writes* that Romney's career “coincided with the single most dynamic
period in the history of British art”. Romney
was one of 10 brothers born to a furniture maker living in Dalton in
Furness. He received only a basic education, but his gift at portraiture
revealed itself at an early age. The
early portraits in this exhibition situate his subjects in elaborate
settings to convey their status in society as property-owners, dressed
in striking clothes and surrounded by their pets or other signs of their
education and culture. Role
playing assumes many guises in his paintings of females as muses or
mythological figures. When Romney dispenses with these trappings and
focuses on his sitter’s personality he comes most into his own. He
doesn’t always flatter his subjects unduly. He makes up with dignity
what they may lack in beauty. We are given a sense of presence -
gravitas combined with immediacy - in his depictions of local
gentry such as Mr and Mrs William Lindow and Mrs Joan Knatchbull. As
Kidson writes, Romney’s “interest or absorption in the physical beauty
of his sitter – be it woman, young man or even child – was almost frighteningly
direct, with the forms of the body exquisitely modelled and painted
with palpable intensity”. He
loved painting the uninhibited Emma Hart, who posed for him in many
guises, inspiring some of his most intimate and informally composed
works. Emma Hart first sat for Romney in 1782. Emma soon left for Naples,
where now married to Lord Hamilton, she became Nelson’s mistress. By
1772 Romney could charge 40 guineas a whole-length likeness, giving
him an income of around £1,200 a year which put him in the top class
of earners of his day. Romney’s
patrons came from “all quarters of the political compass”. He became
a supporter of the French Revolution of 1789 and was invited to dinner
by Thomas Paine, the author of The Rights of Man in 1791. Paine
and Thomas Walker, the Manchester radical, sat to Romney for portraits
which were engraved by another democrat, William Sharp. But, Kidson
notes, while Romney’s house in London’s fashionable Cavendish Square
was a safe haven for revolutionaries like Paine, Romney himself was
never investigated for his republican sympathies. Indeed,
even while consorting with Paine, he applied to succeed Reynolds as
Portrait Painter to the King! By
now Romney was anxious to make paintings of “the imagination” but he
never realised his ambition was to become a “history painter”. The exhibition
includes many drawings in chalk, and ink and wash which show these aspirations.
Whether or not they display a major repressed talent is up for debate. What
is certain is that this is a unique chance to see the man who challenged
Sir Joshua Reynolds for supremacy, adding a dynamic and intriguing dimension
to create the powerful English portrait tradition in the second half
of the 18th century. The
National Portrait Gallery’s own splendidly brooding Self Portrait and
Kenwood’s Emma as the Spinstress and the Tate Gallery’s Emma Hart as
Circe can be viewed in a fresh light alongside paintings from Australia,
the U.S. and private collections. George Romney is at the National Portrait Gallery until August 18. Admission £6/£4. www.npg.org.uk Recorded information 020 7312 2463. It travels to Huntington Art Collections, San Marino, USA from 15 September –1 December 2002. *The
catalogue by Alex Kidson is published by the National Portrait Gallery
at £40/£25 paperback. 256 pages with 216 illustrations.
|
Mr &
Mrs William Lindow
Study
of Emma Hart as Circe
Self Portrait |
||||