Agreement of People website

Sign here if you support the campaign for a real democracy


Our blogs


 

AWTW FacebookAWTW Twitter

Your Say


 

 

Galloway victory confirms political meltdown

The Bradford West by-election triumphantly won by George Galloway confirms that Labour’s support in working class communities is extremely fragile and that a major political crisis is coming to a head in Britain.

A veritable collapse in Labour’s vote – a majority of over 5,700 was turned into a defeat by more than 10,000 – should not disguise the fact that support for the Tory Party, which targeted the constituency as a winnable seat in the 2010 election, fell away almost as dramatically by over 22%.

Horsegate, grannygate, donorgate, pastygate, workfaregate, a budget based on tax breaks for the rich, legislation that wrecks the national health service – it could all be summed up by the expression attributed to Queen Marie Antoinette, “let them eat cake”.

And we know what happened to her in the wake of the French Revolution. Substitute cold pasties for cake and we’re living in the present.

Ed Miliband’s party should have walked home in Bradford West in the wake of the disarray at the highest levels of government, exemplified by the officially-induced panic at the petrol pumps despite the fact that tanker drivers haven’t even set a strike date over pay and condition.

Instead, Labour viewed the predominantly Asian community as voting fodder. Galloway seized on this and by all accounts succeeded in mobilising young people to back him as candidate. Asian voters seemed to have decamped en masse to Galloway.

Labour was dubbed “austerity lite” by Galloway, who is now a Respect MP for the second time. But that’s not the half of it, not even the beginning of the story. In Bradford, Labour implemented the spending cuts ordered by Whitehall and added to the dole queue.

At Westminster, Labour has supported the attacks on welfare, was compromised on health by its own attacks on the NHS, damned workers who staged strikes in defence of pensions, supported the ConDems military adventures while making a “prosperous capitalism” the target of a Miliband government.

In truth, Miliband, Cameron and Clegg are seen as variations on a political establishment whose differences with each other are at the margins. Their lives and outlooks are far removed from the concerns of ordinary working people having their standard of living slashed, their pensions wrecked, their services cut and paying through the nose to get work whether by public transport or car.

Not that Galloway and Respect are out to provide a clear alternative to Labour. On the contrary, Galloway – ever the political opportunist – used his victory speech to tell his supporters: “I do care about the Labour Party in which I served for 37 years, for 18 as Labour MP, and appeal to Labour Party to turn away and break decisively from the path of treason set for them by Tony Blair 20 years ago.”

He added: “So I appeal to the Labour Party to be a Labour Party once again, to unite the coalition they once had, and of which I was once part. That’s the way to really defeat the Tories and the Liberal Democrats.”

So voting for Galloway was a way of sending a message to Miliband! What a misuse of people’s support.

Taking demagogy a little too far, Galloway claimed the result represented a "Bradford spring" delivered "by the Grace of God”. Turning out at a by-election can hardly be compared with the sacrifices made in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Bahrain and Syria over the past year or so.

Nevertheless, the sensational Bradford West result indicates a vacuum at the heart of the British political system as the economic crisis worsens, with all the major parties discredited in the eyes of the electorate. There is an unparalleled opportunity to argue and campaign for a new democratic constitution. This would deliver power to the people and remove it from the bankers and corporations who, with their political proxies, are responsible for the emerging social catastrophe.

Paul Feldman
Communications editor
30 March 2012

Bookmark and Share

Your Say


Jonathan Murray-Lacey says:

‘…the sensational Bradford West result indicates a vacuum at the heart of the British political system ‘ They have their approach to how to interpret Galloway and as the above shows they will take this two ways; those that voted for him and his platform. Of course he can not deliver this and there is the emptiness of Westminster.

The attempt to attack Galloway’s victory for previous ‘non attendance’, apart from continual exposed deceitfulness, exposes a number of aspects: He got the vote; they voted, and this despite that Westminster has been exposed more and more widely that is to more and more layers normally hedged in, and out, of access to the goings on within the state structure and its appendages. Now more widely seen as a rubber stamping old boys talking shop: Tax Laws – State violence – war credits; its apparent main powers, but as I said, a rubber stamp at that. And all those listed above.

It exposes that representation at that level are ignorant that those voting don’t have any doubts as to the emptiness of Westminster – and Whitehall as any form of anything but oppressors to them and their brothers and sisters – and communities.

A hundred times yes and a hundred times more application. Both a vacuum and a void: the contempt with which these governments carry on making it up as they go will increasingly lead to disasters. No amount of ‘good advice’ from the likes of Galloway could be heeded; and failures tend to demoralize: but times are explosive. With the almost certainty of Livingston’s winning it ought to be recalled what he wrote in the Forward to Gerry Healy A REVOLUTIONARY LIFE with regards to the Palestinians: ‘Gerry Healy and the News Line worked with a group of us in the Labour Party to end Labour’s silence on the repression of the Palestinian people. In the aftermath of the slaughter of Palestinians in the Sabra and Shattila camps, we succeeded in winning the recognition of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian People by the Labour Party Conference of 1982.’ Since then (1994) lesson has heaved through lives. Whether or not one takes the bankers to the chop – one ought to remember The Commune and a major blunder. Take the bank. But the comment and his history will assure him of a solid base.

This vote frightens them – Galloway they can deal with. This leaves us, as put above, not only must we organise in Assemblies a campaign to reach people – that is essential. He had a platform and that is necessary at every turn.


Chris Gibson says:

I shall believe this, and I want to, when the same process happens in a white Labour seat.


Dave Ainslie says:

Correct in every way, there is a real opportunity for a genuinely socialist party to emerge and galloway wasnt crowing, the right careerists that masquerade as labour should take note, in my union branch there are many opting out of the levy, be warned labour your horrible shift to the right has caused huge disillusionment and if you can lose a strong constitueny like bradford then you will lose the next election, listen to john macdonnell now


Comments now closed

We do not store your name or email details, but may inform you if someone responds to your comment.

If you want weekly update messages please indicate and we will store your details in a secure database which is not shared with any other organisation.

Your name

Your E-mail
(we will not publish your E-mail)

Do you want Updates?

Anti-spam validation:compare< Please enter these letters>